Saturday, February 28, 2009
Charlie Rose' by Samuel Beckett
This is famously reclipped Charlie Rose video by Andrew Fillipone, Jr, in which Rose appears to be interviewing himself with little success about the future of the internet.
Source PSFK
Monday, February 9, 2009
Add-Art: The Entire Web as Art Gallery
Introduction to Add-Art from Steve Lambert on Vimeo.
Read more here Source PSFK
Thursday, January 15, 2009
An Animated History of the Internet
History of the Internet from PICOL on Vimeo.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
YouTube to Create Global Orchestra Online
Wednesday, November 26, 2008
В новом отчете Центра цифровых технологий будущего говорится, что в ряде стран мира доступ к интернету уже имеют около 100% детей от 12 до 14 лет.
Центр цифровых технологий будущего (Center for the Digital Future) опубликовал результаты нового опроса молодых людей в возрасте от 12 до 14 лет из 13 стран мира о доступе в интернет. По доступности интернета для молодежи лидирует Великобритания - там Сетью пользуются 100% опрошенных. На втором месте Израиль - 98%. Далее идут Чехия и Макао (по 96%), а также Канада (95%). США оказались только на шестом месте - 88% респондентов заявили, что имеют доступ к Сети.
В рамках данного исследования, сотрудники университета Южной Калифорнии опросили более 25 тыс. молодых людей в странах Азии, Северной и Южной Америки, Европы и Австралии и период с начала 2007 г. по 2008 г.
Среди пользователей старше 18 лет, по доступности интернета лидируют Швеция, Новая Зеландия, Канада и США, передает CNews.
Также в отчете говорится, что мобильные телефоны для доступа в Сеть
использует очень малое количество опрошенных во всех странах, за исключением Британии. Многие аналитики прогнозируют быстрый рост популярности мобильного интернета среди пользователей. Особенно он будет заметен в Юго-Восточной Азии и Африке.
Source BYBANNER.COM & Center for the Digital Future
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
WEB GIANTS LAUNCH HUMAN RIGHTS CODE FOR DESPOT NATIONS
WASHINGTON, DC: Following sustained criticism of their craven compliance with personal information demands by totalitarian regimes, the planet's dominant web trio –Google, Yahoo and Microsoft – have adopted a new code of conduct drafted by a group that includes human rights organizations Members of Congress and democratic rights organizations worldwide have condemned the companies for supplying personal information to authoritarian governments.
Yahoo, in particular, faced questioning by Congress last year for surrendering emails that led to the imprisonment of Chinese dissidents.
The new code, titled the Global Network Initiative, comprises a set of principles drafted over the past two years. They undertake to . . .
- Protect the personal information of their users wherever they do business;
- "Narrowly interpret and implement government demands that compromise privacy," as defined by the code;
- Scrutinize a country's track record of jeopardizing personal information and freedom of expression before launching new businesses in that country;
- Discuss all such risks widely with executives and board members of a signatory company.
While Yahoo ceo Jerry Yang [in what might be a valedictory message] hailed the new principles as "a valuable roadmap that will help ensure that technology and the internet continue to help improve people's lives".
But dissenting voices say the code does not go far enough. "More serious questions have to be asked about [a participating] company's legal obligations," argues Morton Sklar, US executive director of theWorld Organization for Human Rights.
Sklar wants the code to address whether internet companies are violating US or international laws by complying with requests from certain governments.
Data sourced by WARC from Wall Street Journal Online; additional content by WARC staff, 29 October 2008
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Our Old Language

Our behaviour and the technologies we use change faster than the language we use (I'm still "spinning" when I'm DJ'ing, even though the only thing spinning these days is my hard drive).
Similarily, old models trap us into using outdated mental constructs to make sense of a world that no longer really fits those models. I'm fascinated by this, and the process by which we collectively abandon those old models.
Journalism and the "news" is a perfect example. Matt over at the Newsless.org has written a series of brilliant posts over the past couple of months that explore new ways of thinking about journalism. An emerging theme is the assertion that the article is no longer the basic unit of the news
From what I can tell, we inherited this state of affairs from our printed predecessors. When we started news sites, there was just no other plainly obvious way to present news stories, and most of those stories were coming from the newspaper at any rate. So we presented them on the Web the same way we do in print — discrete, self-contained compositions, including whatever context could fit into a paragraph or two, ornamented with photos and graphics.
Parallels to how marketers and brands think about media and communication are pretty clear. For the most part, the discret, self-contained composition has the "creative idea" (or, the television advertisement). Mostly because, well, that's the way it has been, technology packaged it like that, and so on.
Matt has some brilliant thoughts on what the future looks like, starting with the understanding that "every news event represents a data point to another story", and that a richer understanding of the broader topic might generate further interest in that topic. Many of the other data points might not be known to us right away, but it will be the job of journalism to provide that context by using powers of pattern recognition to connect the dots (planners pick up your pencils and get to work, because in marketing that will be you doing the lion's share of pattern recognition).
So, rather than think of articles as compact pieces limited by the physical space they once occupied (in print for instance), and aimed at a target audience of people who knew what the story was all about in the first place because where would you have the luxury to spell out the context?, the job now is to expand our understanding by building richer stories, more layers and a stronger context for the interconnected pieces.
That last point is crucial, especially when thinking about brands and media, since we'll need to make sure that we don't confuse the article (the advertising) from the story (the context, the interconnected ecosystem of nodes that "bubble up" to a something much bigger). For, as Matt says, somewhat echoing a transmedia vision of what the future might look like.
